Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for the Prevention of Graft-vs.-Host Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Guide to Management for the Advanced Practitioner.

Cyclophosphamide remains a critical component to haploidentical transplant conditioning regimens. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) emerged as an effective component of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in the nonmyeloablative haploidentical bone marrow transplant setting. The relative ease of administration compared with ex vivo manipulations and efficacy in reducing GVHD has led to increasing PTCy use in transplant centers around the world. The role of PTCy has expanded to haploidentical transplantation with myeloablative conditioning regimens and peripheral blood progenitor cells as the donor source. Moreover, encouraging results in GVHD management have been shown with the use of PTCy alone or in combination with other immunosuppressives in the human leukocyte antigen-matched donor setting. The toxicity profile of cyclophosphamide varies extensively depending on dose, duration, overall drug exposure, and, potentially, pharmacogenetics. This review highlights the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxic effects of cyclophosphamide and offers practical guidance for clinical application in the post-transplant setting. We summarize data on the management of high-dose cyclophosphamide toxicities and provide insights into the pharmacogenetic implications on drug efficacy and safety data.

Single-center experience with use of letermovir for treatment of CMV infection in stem cell transplant recipients.

The approval of letermovir provided a new option for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in CMV seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Data are limited on the use of letermovir for the treatment of CMV infection. We performed a single-center retrospective review of allo-HSCT recipients who received letermovir off-label for treatment of CMV infection (CMV DNAemia and CMV disease) from November 2017 until November 2019. Fifteen patients were included, 14 of which received letermovir for treatment of CMV DNAemia. The median duration from transplant to CMV DNAemia was 41 days and median duration of letermovir therapy was 53 days (IQR, 43-59). Median time to first undetectable CMV viral load from the start of letermovir was 16 days (IQR, 13-21). No significant correlation was noted between the time to CMV DNA clearance and either CMV DNA at the time of starting letermovir (r = -.12, 95% CI: -0.63-0.46; P = .69) or CMV DNA peak (r = .04, 95% CI: -0.51-0.58, P = .87). Three patients had late reactivation of CMV after completion of letermovir (20%) after 87 days (IQR, 68-103) of therapy cessation. Clinical failure or treatment intolerance occurred in two patients (14%). One patient failed to achieve an undetectable viral load. In another patient, letermovir was discontinued due to documented therapy-related thrombocytopenia. Our analysis suggests that letermovir might have a potential role for the treatment of CMV infection in select patients with contraindication or intolerance to more validated therapies.

Safety and Cost Benefits of the Rapid Daratumumab Infusion Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Daratumumab is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in both frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. Its major limitation is the long infusion time, especially with the first dose. Recent data demonstrated the feasibility of infusing daratumumab at an accelerated rate of 90 minutes starting from cycle 1 on day 15. Herein, we report the safety profile and cost associated with rapid daratumumab infusion protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review was performed to identify patients who completed at least 1 cycle of daratumumab (single agent or in combination) from April 2016 to October 2018. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: cohort 1 received rapid daratumumab infusion after its implementation in March 2018, whereas cohort 2 included patients treated with daratumumab administered at the standard rate. The primary endpoint was to compare differences in rates of infusion-related reactions (IRRs). An Excel (Microsoft)-based model was developed to estimate cost and productivity. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with relapsed/refractory disease were included in this study (53 in cohort 1 and 47 in cohort 2). Of the 53 patients in cohort 1, 18 (34%) received rapid daratumumab infusion starting with cycle 1. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in rates of IRRs between cohort 1 and 2 (1.9% vs. 4.3%, P = .59); 1 patient in cohort 1 developed an IRR. The total costs estimated for a 52-week regimen of daratumumab infused at standard and rapid rates were $137,200 and $122,200 (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that rapid daratumumab infusion is safe and tolerable and provides cost savings for patients with relapsed/refractory disease.

Antimicrobial de-escalation in adult hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of empiric antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenia of unknown origin is unclear. This study evaluated outcomes in autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin who received early de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials prior to hematopoietic recovery versus those who continued broad-spectrum antimicrobials until hematopoietic recovery. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study assessed hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin. Patients were categorized into either cohort 1, representing early de-escalation prior to hematopoietic recovery, or cohort 2, representing continuation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials until hematopoietic recovery. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included (22.4% in cohort 1 and 77.6% in cohort 2). Most patients (87.5%) in cohort 1 underwent haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation, whereas 84.3% of patients in cohort 2 received autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. There were no significant differences in rates of recurrent fever (4.2% versus 7.2%, in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, adjusted odds ratio = 0.84, P = 0.85), re-escalation (4.2% versus 4.8%, adjusted odds ratio = 1.57, P = 0.64), and Clostridioides difficile-associated infections (4.2% versus 2.4%, adjusted odds ratio = 2.27, P = 0.43). No patient experienced in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit admission, or bacteremia. CONCLUSION: Hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with febrile neutropenia of unknown origin in which broad-spectrum antimicrobials were de-escalated prior to hematopoietic recovery did not experience adverse outcomes. These results concur with recently published studies and the Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia guidelines. An early de-escalation approach in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients specifically appears safe and may result in a reduction in antimicrobial utilization.

Clinical pharmacology of oncology agents in older adults: A comprehensive review of how chronologic and functional age can influence treatment-related effects.

Unique challenges exist when managing older adults with cancer. Associations between cancer and age-related physiologic changes have a direct impact on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer therapies and can affect drug dosing, dose intensity, efficacy, safety and quality of life. The breadth and depth of these issues, however, have not been fully evaluated because the majority of clinical trials have focused on a younger and healthier population. As a consequence, little information is available to support clinicians in making evidence-based decisions regarding treatment with cancer therapies in older adults, especially those over age 75. Prior clinical pharmacology reviews summarized the literature on how age-related physiologic changes can influence and affect conventional and targeted anti-cancer treatments. Our article provides an updated review with expanded information that includes small molecule kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, immunotherapies, hormonal, conventional, and miscellaneous agents. Additionally, our article integrates how functional age, determined by the geriatric assessment (GA), can also influence treatment-related effects and health outcomes. Broadening cancer therapy trials to capture not only chronologic age but also functional age would allow clinicians to better identify subsets of older adults who benefit from treatment versus those most vulnerable to morbidity and/or mortality.